Login Register

In my opinion: Britain well placed to survive as independent nation

By Western Morning News  |  Posted: October 24, 2012

Comments (0)

In his letter "EU trade is vital to Britain's economy" (Letters, Monday October 15), J L Sanchez uses a number of tactics common to those who argue against the UK leaving the EU.

No-one would disagree with the heading to his letter, because obviously all trade world wide is "vital to Britain's economy".

However, Mr Sanchez maintains that UKIP seek to replace "all the trade which would be lost as a result" (of leaving the EU) with trade with the Commonwealth. He later writes that 3.5 million UK jobs are "linked to the export of goods and services to the EU". I wouldn't dispute that, but does he know that the official figures relating to "trade with the EU" always include any exports beyond the EU which happen to pass through ports within the EU such as Rotterdam? Does he also know of any estimates of the number of jobs in the EU (not counting the UK, of course) which rely on trade from the rest of the EU into the UK? Every estimate I've seen exceeds 3.5 million. Mr Sanchez obviously believes that the EU will sacrifice many of these jobs – what, as an act of spite? – if we leave. Surely they won't stop selling us cars, wines, foods and I don't know what else? Clearly not. No-one, as Mr Sanchez claims, is suggesting the UK turns its back on the EU. UKIP's policy is to trade freely with the whole world and the last time I looked (though its leaders and supporters sometimes appear to live on another planet), Europe was part of that world.

If he believes that UKIP is living in 1912, then his reference to Britain's closeness to mainland Europe until wicked old Henry the Eighth scuppered it is a bit self-contradictory. Mr Sanchez, back then much of what is now the Commonwealth wasn't there to be traded with; furthermore, obviously, such overseas trade was via sailing ships rather than jumbo jets and the internet. It tended to restrict nations to trading with close neighbours. Now, the world is our customer, if only we could trade freely. The Commonwealth as a whole is an expanding economy and the currently "impoverished" members are what are accurately described as "developing" nations.

Britain is well-placed through its history and language to survive perfectly well as an independent nation in the modern world. Breaking away from the EU may well be the kick up the backside that we need to get people pulling together and climbing out of recession faster than when held back by the bureaucracy of the EU.

Lastly I would pose my usual question: why, Mr Sanchez, do you support a form of government which cannot be removed via the ballot box? Did you not study any history?

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters
  • Baby_boomer  |  October 30 2012, 1:08PM

    I think you can answer your final point yourself, if UKIP stopped peddling the same old trash about the EU being unaccountable. UKIP's biggest shortcoming is that it's built on the completely false assumption that we are inextricably tied into and dominated by the EU when this is in fact not the case. We can quite legitimately secede completely from the EU any time we like - all it takes is for such a vote to be ratified by the two Houses of Parliament. This unequivocally demonstrates that it is in fact Westminster which remains sovereign and not some "bunch of foreigners" in Brussels that the little-Englanders in UKIP and others on the far right (such as their anti-EU bedfellows the BNP and EDL) would have us all believe. So, as long as the electorate continues to vote for the three mainstream parties, as it undoubtedly will in varying ratios for the foreseeable future, it is utterly futile for UKIP to keep on about European elections when it is only through Westminster (which still remains sovereign) that an exit from the EU can come about. Of course, the trouble with UKIP is that it's not really a political party at all. It is in reality no more than a single issue pressure group playing at party politics. It also seems to attract large numbers of old duffers still living in 1912 rather than 2012 who were brought up on a diet of ration-books and Empire and who bizarrely still think that a quarter of the world map is still coloured pink – or at least ought to be! And try these for reference - 1. http://tinyurl.com/3m8cpmw 2. http://tinyurl.com/75vs7a9 3. http://tinyurl.com/7s8gf7g

    Rate   7
    Report

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES

       
       
       

      MOST POPULAR