Login Register

Tories must flesh out stance on Europe for next election

By Western Morning News  |  Posted: December 11, 2012

David Cameron speaking at an EU summit last month, where leaders failed to reach a decision on the next seven-year budget

David Cameron speaking at an EU summit last month, where leaders failed to reach a decision on the next seven-year budget

Comments (0)

MP George Eustice says David Cameron’s keynote Europe speech should set out Conservative manifesto pledges.

There is now a lot riding on David Cameron's much trailed "big speech" on the future of Britain's relationship with the EU. It has been talked about since last summer. Number 10 would certainly not have wanted to have so much advance speculation about what it might say and they have been minded to delay the day, presumably fearful that it might disappoint. So, instead, speculation has become like a growing monster.

The first thing David Cameron needs to do is to untangle the negotiations that can take place right now in this Parliament from those which must be postponed for another day, after the next election. There are two major areas where the coalition Government (Lib Dems and all) will necessarily end up in a re-negotiation with the EU.

Firstly, the brinkmanship over delivering a real-terms freeze to the EU budget which has been led by Britain is likely to continue well into the New Year. David Cameron must stand firm on this. We should not be making cuts in Britain only to give inflation-busting budget increases to inept officials in the EU.

Secondly, the British Government has already made clear that it will exercise a right it has under the Lisbon Treaty to opt back out of 130 EU directives that Gordon Brown signed up to relating to justice and home affairs, but will then seek to pick and choose those it wants to co-operate with and those which will be vetoed for good.

There is nervousness among some Lib Dems about some of these re-negotiations but the Prime Minister must stand his ground and exercise Britain's right, under the treaty, to sort out the mess in some of these laws.

Then there is the longer-term picture. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are, emotionally, poles apart when it comes to views about the EU and it is no good ignoring that central coalition dynamic. Many Conservatives, myself included, want to see a more fundamental re-negotiation of Britain's relationship with the EU, with powers returned in many areas while we remain an enthusiastic and committed member of the single market.

But, because of the dynamics of the coalition, this more fundamental re-negotiation must be postponed. Ironically, the intervention of UKIP at the last General Election might have denied the country a Conservative majority, thus undermining the cause they claim to believe in.

So David Cameron must start to set out what will be in the next Conservative manifesto. It is no longer enough to use slogans such as "in Europe, not run by Europe". We need to flesh out in more detail what a future re-negotiation would look like and seek a mandate for that position at the next election. This could include taking powers back in areas such as social and employment policy, a looser relationship with the Common Agricultural Policy and Common Fisheries Policy and the return of responsibility for regional policy, which could mean we have more to spend on regeneration in Cornwall. Such a new deal could also involve clipping the wings of wayward EU institutions like the European Court of Justice which currently has too much power.

Some say such a funda mental re-negotiation is impossible but they are wrong. There are growing calls within Germany and the EU Commission for a new treaty in Europe which would totally re-order the European Union and accelerate political union among some members.

No longer would this be something done by stealth, but political integration would become an overt aim in order to try to save the euro.

But countries like Germany fully understand that it is impossible for Britain and possibly many others to follow, so there would be a fork in the road and Britain would need to be given new powers back in return for agreeing to such a new order. If Angela Merkel is re-elected at the end of next year, this agenda will rise rapidly during 2014 and Britain must get into the driver's seat now.

Any discussion about the EU always ends up slipping into the rut of whether or not we need a referendum. My own view is that this is a distraction which undermines the central aim of re-negotiation but, at the end of the process, there is a case for having such a referendum on the outcome to draw a line under things and move on.

George Eustice is Conservative MP for Camborne and Redruth.

Read more from Western Morning News

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters
  • 2ladybugs  |  December 11 2012, 10:07AM

    What we need to be asking ourselves is what have we gained, if anything by joining the EU. The same question needs to be asked as to what have we lost by joining. There seems to be a big chasm between what we are expected to contribute to this contrived European Parliament, who seem to be able to manipulate our every move and what we get out of it. I would rather our country controlled its own future than another layer of bureaucrats deciding what we can and can't do.

    |   -8

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES