Login Register

Brian May visits Somerset badger cull zone

By Western Morning News  |  Posted: October 02, 2013

  • Brian May talks with an anti-cull protester at Camp Badger in Somerset. He was last night planning to join activists on a 'wounded badger patrol'

Comments (6)

Queen guitarist and anti-cull activist Brian May visited West Somerset as the badger cull in the area entered its final days.

It was the second visit of the rock legend and high-profile opponent to one of the two pilot cull areas, following his trip to Gloucestershire last month.

May, who is a member of the Team Badger campaign, spent the day yesterday speaking to protesters, who have been keeping a vigil since the culls began at the end of August.

Last night, he planned to join activists on the regular "wounded badger patrol".

Protesters at Camp Badger – fields provided by a sympathetic landowner in Ash Priors, near Bishops Lydeard – are confident their direct action has helped to disrupt a pilot scheme which they claim was doomed to fail.

Jay Tiernan, spokesman for the group hoping to sabotage the cull in Somerset, told the WMN he believed the cull had been "a massive failure".

Mr Tiernan said a lack of worms meant the animals were not gathered at the setts but foraging alone.

"I think they will have killed at best 20% of the badgers and it may be as low as 12%, he added.

"The methodology is flawed, partly because of the weather but also because of the sheer number they had to kill.

"It was obvious from the start they would not be able to meet the numbers, it was only a matter of by what percentage they would fail."

Some 5,000 badgers are intended to be shot during the pilots in a bid to prove their effectiveness in tackling the spread of tuberculosis in cattle.

Last week, Prime Minister David Cameron promised to press on with the cull, despite fears the Somerset pilot risked failing because not enough badgers had been shot.

An online petition that May started against the pilot cull became the most signed on the official Government website, with more than 300,000 signatures.

And it emerged earlier this week that Avon and Somerset Police were investigating claims that a marksman had been allegedly threatened with a weapon on September 14, something the protesters claim is a "fabrication".

Anti-cull campaigners have criticised the Government for denying a shot badger was part of the cull, when a police inquiry concluded otherwise. The pilots aim to assess if culling can be done effectively, safely and humanely, with plans to roll out the scheme more widely in areas that are hotspots for TB in cattle.

Farmers and the Government insist culling of badgers, which can spread TB to cattle, is needed to stop spiralling rates of the disease in herds.

But opponents say culling the animals will have only a small effect on infection rates and will lead to badgers suffering, instead calling for the emphasis to be on vaccines and tighter cattle movement measures.

A protester who gave her name as Sally, from Cornwall, said the protests had been peaceful, mostly involving "torches in your face at nights, whistles and cars tailgating", but absolutely no weapons.

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters

6 comments

  • JuliaMichell  |  October 02 2013, 11:57AM

    Sorry, amendment to my previous comment..."I cannot see how the highest disturbance does not lay at the feet of those willing to destroy it"

    Rate   11
    Report
  • JuliaMichell  |  October 02 2013, 11:56AM

    In reply to mmjames article link above Sir, while I agree that wildlife will be disturbed I cannot see that the highest disturbance lays at the feet of those willing to destroy it in a way that most scientific and wildlife experts deem to be inhumane. Farmers/shooting estate scum/landowners/hunters may be expert in maximsing their profits at the cost of the wildlife that no one owns but they cannot be held up as paragons of the wild.

    Rate   18
    Report
  • JuliaMichell  |  October 02 2013, 11:55AM

    Regarding the article mmjames has cited, here is my response, Sir, while I agree that wildlife will be disturbed I cannot see that the highest disturbance lays at the feet of those willing to destroy it in a way that most scientific and wildlife experts deem to be inhumane. Farmers/shooting estate scum/landowners/hunters may be expert in maximsing their profits at the cost of the wildlife that no one owns but they cannot be held up as paragons of the wild.

    Rate   19
    Report
  • Barri  |  October 02 2013, 11:53AM

    Not for the first time, have the Police been found in the pockets of gangsters.

    Rate   24
    Report
  • JuliaMichell  |  October 02 2013, 11:43AM

    Not a particularly accurate account and I would ask this is cornwall to point out that the cull is NFU driven with farmer/landowner membership totalling a mere 18% and of these not all are cattle farmers but large shooting estates. Also, as a cull protestor from Cornwall I don't concur with Sally's statement, I have never tail-gated nor have I shone a torch in someone's face. Additionally, while the article has mentioned an alleged attack on a pro-culler it has failed to mention the attacks on anti-cullers. Why is this? Finally, Owen Paterson and DEFRA have always maintained that this cull to test the humaneness of free shooting badgers as a way of reducing the rates of bTB in cattle herds, quite different to your report that it is a bid to prove the effectiveness of reducing bTB. Weazel words, weazel government, don't try to twist the story as the cull proves a failure.

    Rate   23
    Report
  • mmjames  |  October 02 2013, 9:51AM
    Rate   -25
    Report

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES

       
       
       

      MOST POPULAR